The naxal fire
Dear Naxal comrades,
Why did you take the Rajdhani Expess—along with its hundreds of passengers—hostage and abduct the drivers?
Though I have a very vague understanding of the Naxal ideology, I do understand that its has gained ground because of the continued deprivation of Naxal organizations' cadre and supporters. You want an end to a flawed system that is unjust to a large fraction of people; even I want the society to be equitable towards everyone.
But why take the recourse of violence, cold-blooded murders? If you start executing people (which you often do in kangaroo courts), doesn't that bring you on a par with your enemy. As an uninvolved spectator, I see both you and your oppressor indulging in anti-social activities.
A few days ago, one of your leaders—Kobad Ghandy—was shouting Long Live Bhagat Singh on his way to court in police custody. If you and your leaders are inspired by the revolutionary, why don't you live up to the expectations of Bhagat Singh. He believed that revolution does not necessarily mean blood shed. Revolutions take place only when the common man starts accepting your ideology and change their way of life. Bhagat Singh was fighting the British government that wasn't concerned about their demands, but you are being invited for talks by the Indian government. I think you need to give up violence if you really wish to bring a change in society.
I know it must be all very exciting and self-righteous in raising an armed-revolution and punishing your oppressors, but you will have to give it up. You have been raging a war since long. What has been the result? It only gives you a false sense of importance.
Naxal violence is causing more harm to the common man, the peasant of your areas. Stop making their lives more miserable with your armed revolt. Take the recourse of a non-violent revolution. If you have become addicted to the adrenaline rush of violence, go, kill corrupt people in the legislature (politician), judiciary and administrative.
Spare the common man.
Your well wisher.
Why did you take the Rajdhani Expess—along with its hundreds of passengers—hostage and abduct the drivers?
Though I have a very vague understanding of the Naxal ideology, I do understand that its has gained ground because of the continued deprivation of Naxal organizations' cadre and supporters. You want an end to a flawed system that is unjust to a large fraction of people; even I want the society to be equitable towards everyone.
But why take the recourse of violence, cold-blooded murders? If you start executing people (which you often do in kangaroo courts), doesn't that bring you on a par with your enemy. As an uninvolved spectator, I see both you and your oppressor indulging in anti-social activities.
A few days ago, one of your leaders—Kobad Ghandy—was shouting Long Live Bhagat Singh on his way to court in police custody. If you and your leaders are inspired by the revolutionary, why don't you live up to the expectations of Bhagat Singh. He believed that revolution does not necessarily mean blood shed. Revolutions take place only when the common man starts accepting your ideology and change their way of life. Bhagat Singh was fighting the British government that wasn't concerned about their demands, but you are being invited for talks by the Indian government. I think you need to give up violence if you really wish to bring a change in society.
I know it must be all very exciting and self-righteous in raising an armed-revolution and punishing your oppressors, but you will have to give it up. You have been raging a war since long. What has been the result? It only gives you a false sense of importance.
Naxal violence is causing more harm to the common man, the peasant of your areas. Stop making their lives more miserable with your armed revolt. Take the recourse of a non-violent revolution. If you have become addicted to the adrenaline rush of violence, go, kill corrupt people in the legislature (politician), judiciary and administrative.
Spare the common man.
Your well wisher.
0 Responses to "The naxal fire"
Post a Comment